dahill d'onofrio stratford ct

TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. 4Whip objects to the motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the Hopkins affidavit is defective and that material issues of fact exist precluding entry of judgment as to liability. Hardiman and Cray would have testified to a loan from D'Onofrio at 4% interest per week; Francis Curcio discussed the loan with Cray and when Hardiman left town before repaying the debt, Gus Curcio told Cray that he was "hunting for" Hardiman. 892(a) authorizes the same penalties for conspiracy, to wit, a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 20 years or both, as for the substantive crime. WebFor over 20 years, Dahill has provided superior document management hardware and software solutions 8200 W Interstate 10, Ste 400, San Antonio, TX 78230 2d 162 (1970);5 that the United States would recommend a sentence of six years imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. Results for this person or the person you are looking for are not guaranteed to appear in search results. Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Harrison, 264 Conn. 829, 839 n.6, 826 A.2d 1102 (2003). Click to reveal 250 Temple St, New Haven, CT, 06511. Although appellants characterize 892(b) as a "presumption", it certainly is not a "mandatory presumption", namely, a rule that "tells the trier that he or they must find the elemental fact upon proof of the basic fact, at least unless the defendant has come forward with some evidence to rebut the presumed connection between the two facts." The young family then moved back to the Woodmont compound and made 16 Villa Rosa Terrace their home. 4Whip does not raise substantive arguments in its opposition with regard to its special defenses concerning personal jurisdiction or satisfaction of the terms of the mortgage and note. No votes were taken. Assistant Attorney General Terrence M. O'Neill appeared on behalf of the respondents. See generally Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108-09 [92 S. Ct. 2294, 835-36, 33 L. Ed. Whatever relevance all this might have to exercise of the court's supervisory power, compare Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U.S. 723, 726, 83 S. Ct. 1417, 1419, 10 L. Ed. WebGet Notified when Dahill A Donofrio's info changes Unlock Background Report View Cell Phone Number The landline phone number 2033789125 is registered to Dahill A In the absence of an evidentiary record we cannot say whether the prosecutor would have been able to invoke Pinkerton. In addition to what has been recounted above, the prosecutor said that Acabbo would testify that at the time when the extensions of credit were made, he believed that the Curcios had reputations for the use of threats and violence in the collection of loans. Later it sentenced them, increasing the sentences of Francis and Gus Curcio from the six years recommended by the Government to nine and eight years respectively and of Garcia from one to two years, and decreasing the sentence of D'Onofrio from the four years recommended by the Government to three. The Bank filed a reply memorandum on September 23, 2010, and the matter was heard at the short calendar on November 1, 2010. Locate on map. 154, 157, 687 A.2d 1309, cert. It seems that JavaScript is not working in your browser. Conf.Rep. Ellsworth would have testified that Cray had brought him to Gus Curcio and D'Onofrio for a loan, which was made at 4% interest per week (208% per year), and that he believed that Curcio and D'Onofrio would cause him physical harm if he failed to repay. New Haven v. God's Corner Church, Inc., 108 Conn.App. FN3. We likewise do not see how a full trial could bring appellants' claim regarding pretrial publicity, in part allegedly the result of prosecutorial misconduct, into sharper focus. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. David L. Dahill is a family medicine doctor in Vallejo, California and is affiliated with Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center. Therefore, the fourth, fifth, seventh and eighth special defenses fail to preclude summary judgment. 2d 205 (1976); United States v. Corr, 543 F.2d 1042, 1050 (2 Cir. Here is Dahill's phone number (203) 929-6629 (Southern New England Tel Co). 2d 368 (1970), and that the rule of Pinkerton v. United States is unconstitutional. He practiced law in West Logan, West Virginia and was the city attorney. Alternatively, the Bank attacks each special defense on an individual basis, arguing that 4 Whip's special defenses fail to preclude summary judgment. 2"(3IOmn?b5 WebD.A.D. He received his medical degree from The Bank moves for summary judgment as to liability on the ground that there is no genuine issue of material fact in the present matter and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 371 (fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than five years or both) is less than for the substantive crime, 18 U.S.C. Each meeting will be held in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, First Floor, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut, for the purpose of conducting a hearing concerning the contested case designated by the corresponding docket number listed below. v. Khan, Superior Court, judicial district of Fairfield, Docket No. We are thus being asked to pass on a contention raising constitutional questions, governed by a Supreme Court decision that has been puzzling to commentators12 and to courts,13 which demand careful scrutiny of a trial record and instructions which do not exist. (4) Upon the making of the extension of credit, the total of the extensions of credit by the creditor to the debtor then outstanding, including any unpaid interest or similar charges, exceeded $100. This case has been pending much too long, a year and a half since the indictment was filed, with three appeals to this court. Angelo is a resident of 487 Commanche Lanes, Stratford, CT 06614. Accordingly, the ninth special defense also fails. endobj Later, on December 3, 1982, he denied motions of the Curcios for reconsideration of his ruling with respect to pretrial publicity. 2d 110] (1972), is void for vagueness. 1982). ], It has been argued that there is a constitutional right to plead conditionally guilty, at least in states in which defendants have the option to plead unconditionally guilty. The fact that no other court has exclusive jurisdiction in any matter is sufficient to give the Superior Court jurisdiction of that matter [T]he general rule of jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior Court but that which specially appears to be so [N]o court is to be ousted of its jurisdiction by implication. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) The Court has dealt with the question in six later cases: Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S. Ct. 1463, 25 L. Ed. New Haven v. God's Corner Church, Inc., 108 Conn.App. Saltzburg, Pleas of Guilty and the Loss of Constitutional Rights: The Current Price of Pleading Guilty, 76 Mich. L. Rev. The court has already addressed the issues of standing and subject matter jurisdiction and need not revisit its prior analysis. The only difficulty apparent to us arises from the use of the verb "could" in the language of the statute. New Haven v. God's Corner Church, Inc., 108 Conn.App. Instagram is a free photo sharing app which allows users to take a photo, apply a digital filter to it, and then share it on multiple social networking services. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Danny_Dahill&oldid=1128358493, Democratic Party members of the West Virginia House of Delegates, People from Fayette County, West Virginia, Democratic Party West Virginia state senators, West Virginia University College of Law alumni, Short description is different from Wikidata, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, This page was last edited on 19 December 2022, at 18:49. (a) Whoever makes any extortionate extension of credit, or conspires to do so, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. ], Whether the Pinkerton doctrine, set forth in Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S. Ct. 1180, 90 L. Ed. Linda D'Onofrio has been working as a Corporate Clinical Director at Ryders Health Management for 1 year. The plea agreements were not signed by the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut but Mr. Keefer represented to the district court that he had orally approved them, The reference was doubtless to the holding in that case that, when the prosecution has substantial evidence of guilt, "An individual accused of crime may voluntarily, knowingly, and understandingly consent to the imposition of a prison sentence even if he is unwilling or unable to admit his participation in the acts constituting the crime." (footnotes omitted). Reconnect with Dahill Donofrio by joining our alumni site today. It is not important for our purposes whether 892(b) is addressed solely to the court as the district judge thought, i.e., the court may not withdraw a case from the jury or set aside a guilty verdict when "it is shown that all of the following factors were present", or whether the court may or, at the Government's request, must charge the jury that it may consider the factors in deciding whether the prosecution has established an extortionate extension of credit as defined in 891(6). The Burns court, speaking through Chief Judge Feinberg, elaborated on our concerns, previously voiced in United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46 (2 Cir. Find census, military, and other historical records.*. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. In the first four cases the constitutional claims were held not to survive the guilty plea; in the last two, as in Haynes, supra, 390 U.S. 85, 88 S. Ct. 722, 19 L. Ed. Indeed, as pointed out in 1 Weinstein & Berger, Evidence under the United States Rules, p 303, at 303-25 (1982), the novelty of Allen, and the point on which the majority of five and the minority of four divided, was its holding that in determining whether a "permissive presumption" satisfied the rationality test "the proper evidence to scrutinize is not the general experience of the community or the validity of the legislative findings which support the presumption, but rather the evidence submitted in the particular case at issue." 989] (1954), or is so indefinite that "it encourages arbitrary and erratic arrests and convictions," Papachristou v. Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156, 162 [92 S. Ct. 839, 843, 31 L. Ed. and three grandchildren. It is true that insofar as the claim at bar relates to the effect of adverse publicity on a trial jury as distinguished from a grand jury, the voir dire might have resulted in exclusion of members of the panel who had been tainted by the publicity or, if the taint was sufficiently general, in the transfer of the trial from Bridgeport, where the publicity had been centered, to one of the several other places fixed for holding court in the District of Connecticut or, on defendants' motion, F.R.Cr.P. Reply Brief, p. 3. Gus Curcio came next with a plea to Count Two. As said in Menna v. New York, supra, 423 U.S. at 62-63 n. 2, 96 S. Ct. at 242 n. 2, "a counseled plea of guilty is an admission of factual guilt so reliable that, where voluntary and intelligent, it quite validly removed the issue of factual guilt from the case." Finally, 4 Whip's ninth special defense, alleging the defectiveness, unenforceability and prematurity of the Bank's action as a result of the first through eighth special defenses is unavailing. Spokeo's database, while extensive, does not contain all U.S. warrant, arrest, court, or other related records. Sometimes Dahill goes by various nicknames including (b) In any prosecution under this section, if it is shown that all of the following factors were present in connection with the extension of credit in question, there is prima facie evidence that the extension of credit was extortionate, but this subsection is nonexclusive and in no way limits the effect or applicability of subsection (a): (1) The repayment of the extension of credit, or the performance of any promise given in consideration thereof, would be unenforceable, through civil judicial processes against the debtor, (A) in the jurisdiction within which the debtor, if a natural person, resides or, (B) in every jurisdiction within which the debtor, if other than a natural person, was incorporated or qualified to do business. 2d 138 (1968)); McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S. Ct. 1441, 25 L. Ed. The hearing convened at 11:06 AM, with Hearing Officer, Tracie C. Brown presiding. The sixth special defense alleges a lack of personal jurisdiction and is again unsupported by any factual allegations. Company: SUCCESS INC. Business Number: 536260 Business Address: 4 WHIPPOORWILL Dahill has lived with Santa in a single family house in Stratford, CT. Search for birth, death, marriage, divorce, US Census, and military records. Viewing the available evidence in a light most favorable to 4 Whip, the Bank has established a prima facie case of mortgage foreclosure and 4 Whip's special defenses are insufficient to withstand the entry of summary judgment. 1489 (1946), on which the prosecutor represented he would be obliged to rely, should be overruled. The same would seem to be true with respect to appellants' claim of prejudicial publicity if this is read to be, as again we think it must, that the effect of the publicity had been such that nothing short of dismissal of the indictment would do. (3) At the time the extension of credit was made, the debtor reasonably believed that either, (A) one or more extensions of credit by the creditor had been collected or attempted to be collected by extortionate means, or the nonrepayment thereof had been punished by extortionate means; or. The plea agreements with the other defendants were similar except that Gus Curcio and D'Onofrio were to plead guilty to Count Two and Garcia to Count One; that the recommended sentences were to be four years for D'Onofrio and one year for Garcia; and that Exhibit A attached to each agreement was limited to the first two questions listed in Exhibit A to the agreement with Francis Curcio and the representation by the United States was limited to its need to utilize 18 U.S.C. It particularly noted, id., that. He did not take an appeal. Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations is the listed occupation for now. Attached to the Bank's reply are authenticated copies of the exhibits referred to in the second Hopkins affidavit..FN6. Allen makes plain that the constitutionality of Congress' having directed either of such courses of action is not to be decided in vacuo. Edward Peruta appeared on his own behalf. Gilroy Daly of the District Court for Connecticut, from judgments of conviction entered on their guilty pleas. 2d 628 (1974) (prosecution's making more serious charge after defendant had exercised right to seek trial de novo in higher court); and Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 96 S. Ct. 241, 46 L. Ed. The void-for-vagueness claim, read as we believe it must be, can be determined by analysis of the statute and, if appellants are right, would prevent them or anyone else from being convicted under it. Neither can the evidentiary deficiency be cured by our relying on the prosecutor's proffers at the taking of the pleas and appellants' acquiescence in them. Practice Book 9-16 provides: If, pending the action, the plaintiff assigns the cause of action, the assignee, upon written motion, may either be joined as a co-plaintiff or be substituted as a sole plaintiff, as the judicial authority may order; provided that it shall in no manner prejudice the defense of the action as it stood before such change of parties.. 2d 763 (1970) (guilty plea following confession whose voluntariness state offered no constitutionally valid means of testing); Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 90 S. Ct. 1458, 25 L. Ed. The second Hopkins affidavit assert[s] that the affiant [is] employed by the servicing agent for the substitute plaintiff, a relationship strong enough to establish a foundation for the affiant's claims that she [is] familiar with the books and records regarding the defendant's indebtedness. Bank of America, FSB v. Franco, 57 Conn.App. Thus, 4 Whip was made a party to this action due to its status as a subsequent interest holder. The proceedings were digitally recorded. View property details and household demographic information related to income, investments, and interests. Appellants also argue that some of the requirements for the prima facie case set forth in 892(b) are unconstitutionally vague and that this taints 892(a). Your IP: However, the legal principle is not so broad as the Government suggests. Co. of Pennsylvania, 231 Conn. 756, 796, 653 A.2d 122 (1995). But it does relieve the statute of the objection that it punishes without warning an offense of which the accused was unaware. Application of this formulation to the case in hand makes it clear that one of the asserted grounds of unconstitutionality, to wit, that 892(b) creates an unconstitutional presumption, would not have survived an unconditional plea of guilty, since the Government might have made a prima facie case without relying on that subsection.11 The appellants' unconstitutional presumption argument goes to the prosecution's method of proof and is thus governed by the holding in McMann v. Richardson, supra, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S. Ct. 1441, 25 L. Ed. Their name are Joanna D'Onofrio, Richard J Donofrio, and five others. m(%RS+Tu-e8LPuW-s?psgkT&ouHe^fkgGE;Z31Sr]-1* 4 records for "Dahill Donofrio" in "Fairfield County". An evidentiary hearing of the Freedom of Information Commission in the following matter was held on March 4, 2014 in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut. This read, 390 U.S. at 87, n. 2, 88 S. Ct. at 725, n. 2: Petitioner's plea of guilty did not, of course, waive his previous claim of the constitutional privilege. WebThere are 6 other people named Dahill Donofrio on AllPeople. Web29 Hospital Plaza Suite 502 Stamford, CT 06902. 2d 222] (1972).15. Instead the Court held that " [a]s long as it is clear that the presumption is not the sole and sufficient basis for a finding of guilt", it need meet only a "more likely than not" rather than a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and, after analyzing the precise facts and jury instructions in Allen, concluded that the New York statute passed the test as there applied. This evidence was to be used to show that Francis Curcio "was in overall charge of the extortion conspiracy and that he had to personally authorize loans of the size over a few thousand dollars". Med Offices 1st Fl Dept #130. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. It has jurisdiction of all matters expressly committed to it and of all other matters cognizable by any law court of which the exclusive jurisdiction is not given to some other court. 4 Whip was served on January 20, 2009, and the defendant Connecticut Environmental, LLC, was served on January 21, 2009..FN3. He served in the West Virginia House of Delegates (from 195761) and in the State Senate (from 196164). In order to obtain a conviction under the substantive Count Three, to which Francis Curcio pleaded, by virtue of the Pinkerton rule, the Government would be obliged to tender evidence that would support a conviction under the conspiracy Count One, to which he was permitted not to plead. The prosecutor also described evidence with respect to a loan transaction, again involving 3% weekly interest, between Alchimio and Vagnini, who was acting on behalf of Francis Curcio. Moreover, the plea agreement, as we read it, would not be satisfied by our simply saying that we are bound by Pinkerton; rather we would be required to consider whether, as appellants argue in their brief, it should be overruled. At one time when Benedetto fell behind in his "vigorish" payments, D'Onofrio told him that if these were not regularly made, Benedetto "could have a lot of broken bones." Specifically, the Bank argues that it has established a prima facie case for mortgage foreclosure and that 4 Whip's special defenses are legally insufficient. The Court added, 439 U.S. at 391, 99 S. Ct. at 683: This appears to be especially true where the uncertainty induced by the statute threatens to inhibit the exercise of constitutionally protected rights. As of September 5, 2022, Freedom of Information Commission meetings and contested case hearings will resume being conducted in person. JxvleD;lCpfVpY;7tlc0oP ` Vkm72hONyl[CWg7L#%QRovQ8667n,*R2Yir4l.-XtZZLV dTC+QK1@Tn x`{4(D443\AS5l_t We have emphasized only recently the efficacy of the voir dire in cases (Abscam and Watergate) involving far more extensive publicity than occurred here. Angelo Joseph D'onofrio (age 95) is listed at 487 Commanche Lane A Stratford, Ct 06614 and is affiliated with the Republican Party. The hearing convened at 11:09 AM, with Hearing Officer, Tracie C. Brown presiding. v~.c^kQNv}WW`wn#i!%G\S*W^ L0W6(&z,NeO?ybV0k(@e;n6! Stratford, Connecticut. Presumably because his plea was to the conspiracy count, the prosecutor made no further proffer of evidence. NOTICE: The special meeting scheduled in the following matter for March 5, 2014 at 9:30 AM was cancelled. Dahill Donofrio v. Assessor, Town of Stratford; and Town of Stratford An evidentiary hearing of the Freedom of Information Commission in the following matter was held on March 4, 2014 in the Freedom of Information Hearing Room, 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut. Dahill resides with Nona in Shelton, CT in a condominium. Even if, contrary to our belief, we could comply with the reservation concerning Pinkerton, simply by adhering to the rule in that case as a matter of authority, the district court would still have abused its discretion by permitting the reservation. Much space is devoted to arguments concerning the degree of the Government's responsibility for the publicity, with the Government responding that most of the material could have been found in public sources, such as Judge Zampano's statements sentencing Francis Curcio for a similar crime in 1977, a memorandum of Judge Burns revoking his probation in 1980, and an answer filed by the Government on September 15, 1981, in an unrelated case. No votes were taken. Get free summaries of new Second Circuit US Court of Appeals opinions delivered to your inbox! The attorneys all responded "No", and one of them said "It is our contention, your Honor, that the Government could offer proof to that effect.". WebDr. Without careful supervision of the number and variety of issues preserved for appeal, the use of conditional guilty pleas is likely to result in appellate presentation of issues that cannot be adequately reviewed without a full trial record. 21(a), outside the district, in a continuance, or in both. Before the argument of the appeal the court advised counsel by letter that they "should be prepared to address at oral argument the question whether, in view of United States v. Burns, 684 F.2d 1066 (2 Cir. 251, 253 (S.D.W. 2d 763, that a claim of the constitutional invalidity of a confession did not survive a guilty plea. NOTICE: The special meeting scheduled in the following matter for March 4, 2014 at 9:30 AM, was postponed. For similar reasons it was an abuse of discretion to permit Francis Curcio to plead guilty to the substantive offense charged in Count Three of the indictment but to reserve the question whether the holding of Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 645, 648, 66 S. Ct. 1180, 1183, 1184, 90 L. Ed. Thus, 4 Whip was made a party to this action due to its status as a subsequent interest holder. [J]udgment is not completed until damages have been assessed. Tureck v. George, 44 Conn.App. NOTICE: The special meeting scheduled in the following matter for March 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, was postponed. In fact, these questions do not require extensive consideration. 1-707-651-1025. Defendant had moved for dismissal of a count in an indictment charging this offense on the ground that compelling registration violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and pleaded guilty after his motion was denied. Additionally, the defendant Connecticut Environmental Control, LLC, is a party to this action by virtue of a contractor's lien recorded on the Stratford land records on May 31, 2007..FN1. Specifically, the Cook and Hopkins affidavits, along with the copies of the mortgage assignments, establish a chain of title transferring the mortgage and note to the Bank. 1308, 1310 (1978). The Bank states in its memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment that original or certified copies of these documents will be produced at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment..

San Diego Padres City Connect '47 Trucker, Doug Goldstein Howard Stern, James Dean Hicks Net Worth, Articles D